Apparently the FBI didn’t since the Benghazi Report provides a detailed case-relevant linkage to the damage sowed by Clinton’s email “carelessness”.
In previous posts, I concluded that Comey ruled illogically because he didn’t want to tilt a potentially historic election.
For months, left-leaners were crying “foul” … asserting that the DOJ shouldn’t get involved in cases involving high profile candidates in election years … especially if the charges are as trivial as carelessly giving our enemies a backdoor into our nation’s top secret information.
What if that classified information led to the death of an American ambassador and 3 members of his “off-the-books” security detail?
Still just trivial oversight?
Just in case you haven’t had a chance to read the Benghazi Report …
Neither the left- nor right-leaning media echo chambers seem to have landed on what, in my opinion, may be the case study that best demonstrates why Hillary Clinton’s email “carelessness” was a big deal … a life or death situation.
Note to left-leaning readers: This post will be more balanced than you might expect.
I’ll provide some details and links below …. for now, the bottom line:
Though Clinton was hawkish on US involvement in Libya (to oust Gadaffi), she lost the argument and was relegated to implementing Obama’s “lead from behind” and “no boots on the ground” policies.
Accordingly, the State Department under-protected the diplomats (e.g. Ambassador Stevens) who were tasked to “connect” with the anti-Gadaffi rebels.
Said differently, the Presidential Policy disallowed any overt military security for the diplomats … i.e. no marines deployed before or during the attack.
My take: Clinton – who I hold in very low regard – was just implementing the Administration’s “no boots” policy.
She argued the contrary to Obama, but lost the argument … she could have resigned, but that would have been politically inopportune for the Dems in the run-up to the 2012 election. Instead, she dutifully implemented.
Following the attack, Clinton tried to provide air cover for her boss, pitching the fraudulent video defense ad nauseam.
Of course, politicos lying to the American public isn’t exactly new news…
So, again, I’ll give her a pass for being a good team player.
Here’s where things go off-track for Clinton.
According to the Benghazi Report …
There were numerous emails on her home-brew email system that spoke explicitly to the lack of military security for the diplomats and provided details re: the diplomats travel schedules – when and where the diplomats would be, and how little protection they’d have.
Any reasonable person would consider those nuggets to be classified information … even if they weren’t “marked classified at the time that I sent or received them”.
Assuming that the non-secure email system was compromised (a fair assumption, I think) … then the diplomats were sitting ducks.
But, there wasn’t any direct evidence uncovered that Hillary intended to make them sitting ducks … so, harm, but no foul, right?
Here’s some detail from the Benghazi Report that’s worth reading for “texture” and context….