Archive for the ‘CBO – ObamaCare estimates’ Category

How the Feds spend almost $4 trillion each year …

April 6, 2017

Former Treasury official Peter Fisher once said, once said:

“The federal government is basically a gigantic insurance company  with a sideline business in national defense and homeland security.”

To that point …

According to a Pew recap of CBO data:

In fiscal year 2016, which ended this past Sept. 30, the federal government spent just under $4 trillion.

A about $2.7 trillion – more than two-thirds of the total – went for various kinds of social insurance (Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare, unemployment compensation, veterans benefits and the like).

Another $604 billion, or 15.3% of total spending, went for national defense.

Net interest payments on government debt was about $240 billion, or 6.1%.

Education aid and related social services were about $114 billion, or less than 3% of all federal spending.

Everything else – crop subsidies, space travel, highway repairs, national parks, foreign aid and much, much more – accounted for the remaining 6%.

image

A couple of things to think about …

–  Extending Medicaid to 12 million people cost about $60 billion … more than half of the total education budget.

Each 1% bump in interest rates costs about $200 billion annually on a $20 trillion debt …. “eventually” because it takes awhile for the debt to turn over.

Yep, a highly leverage insurance company with diminishing side businesses …

=========

#HomaFiles

Follow on Twitter @KenHoma            >> Latest Posts

=========

Work: Maynard G. Krebs was just ahead of his time …

February 11, 2014

Last week, the CBO reported that 2.5 million people will likely quit their jobs to cash in on ObamaCare subsidies and other government programs.

That brought to mind a famous TV philosopher … Maynard G. Krebs.

image

In the late 1950s and early 1960s. there was a popular TV show called “The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis” … it feature a bon vivant girl-chaser (Dobie) and his beatnik friend Maynard G, Krebs (played by Bob Denver who was Gilligan on Gilligan’s Island).

  • Technical note to younger readers: a beatnik was a self-proclaimed member of the “beat generation” – think early day hippies and slackers.

Maynard had a philosophy of life that wasn’t exactly work-inclined.

In fact, whenever Maynard would hear the word “work” he’s have an immediate reflex action…..

(more…)

“Liberating workers to pursue other activities” … say, what?

February 10, 2014

Hopefully everybody has heard about the CBO report that estimates 2.5 million current workers will either intentionally cut the number of hours they work, or quit work altogether in order to qualify for ObamaCare subsidies.

That estimate is up threefold from the CBO study that was used to justify ObamaCare economics.

Hmmm.

image
Read the full CBO Report

=====

Today I’ll try to stick to the technical aspects of the CBO Report…

 

First, the literal CBO finding:

The reduction in CBO’s projections of hours worked represents a decline in the number of full-time-equivalent workers of about 2.0 million in 2017, rising to about 2.5 million in 2024.

The decline in fulltime-equivalent employment stemming from the ACA will consist of some people not being employed at all and other people working fewer hours.

The estimated reduction stems almost entirely from a net decline in the amount of labor that workers choose to supply, rather than from a net drop in businesses’ demand for labor, so it will appear almost entirely as a reduction in labor force participation and in hours worked.

English translation: the unemployment rate will decline because there will be fewer workers in the labor force.

That’s one way to fix an unemployment problem.

=====

Why the original CBO miss?

The CBO notes that their earlier projection – supportive of ObamaCare – recognized these labor force dynamics, but underestimated them (by a factor of 3).

Why the new upward revisions?

There are several reasons for the difference in the former and current estimates:

CBO has now incorporated into its analysis additional channels through which the ACA will affect labor supply, reviewed new research about those effects, and revised upward its estimates of the responsiveness of labor supply to changes in tax rates.

English translation: Oops, dropped the ball … nothing changed in the world, just our view of the world.

=====

What new research?

What the CBO is referring to is work done by University of Chicago economist Casey Mulligan. Prof. Mulligan’s work isn’t “new”, though.  He was touting it before ObamaCare was enacted.

Putting that technical point aside, the WSJ says that the CBO’s intellectual conversion is directly attributable to Mulligan’s ideas.

Mr. Mulligan’s premise is what economists call “implicit marginal tax rates“.

ObamaCare make work less financially valuable for lower-income Americans.

Because the insurance subsidies are tied to income and phase out as cash wages rise, some people will have the incentive to remain poorer in order to continue capturing higher benefits.

Another way of putting it is that taking away benefits has the same effect as a direct tax, so lower-income workers are discouraged from climbing the income ladder by working harder, logging extra hours, taking a promotion or investing in their future earnings through job training or education.

Specifically, as the CBO put it in their report:

For some people, the availability of exchange subsidies under the ACA will reduce incentives to work both through a substitution effect and through an income effect.

The income effect arises because subsidies increase available resources — similar to giving people greater income — thereby allowing some people to maintain the same standard of living while working less.

The substitution effect arises because subsidies decline with rising income (and increase as income falls), thus making work less attractive.

As a result, some people will choose not to work or will work less — thus substituting other activities for work.

English translation: Workers will be liberated from their personal responsibilities to earn a living and support themselves.

Is this a great county or what?

* * * * *
Follow on Twitter @KenHoma                         >> Latest Posts

Nums: The CBO estimates re: ObamaCare … Medicaid impact.

November 19, 2013

A couple of numbers have gotten a lot of press coverage in the past couple of days …

The 2014 target enrollment for the Exchanges … 7 million.

The number of cancelled individual policies … 5 million.

The latter (5 million) is referred to by administration spokespeople as a “small sliver”.

The former (7 million) is generally positioned as a big, potentially unreachable number.

Gee, are 5 million and 7 million really that different?

Got me thinking and drove me to the official CBO estimates to do some digging re: ObamaCare numbers.

image

A couple of interesting points from the chart …

(more…)

Nums: Some key ObamaCare ones from the CBO …

November 18, 2013

A couple of numbers have gotten a lot of press coverage in the past couple of days …

The 2014 target enrollment for the Exchanges … 7 million.

The number of cancelled individual policies … 5 million.

The latter (5 million) is referred to by administration spokespeople as a “small sliver”.

The former (7 million) is generally positioned by pundits as a big, potentially unreachable number that could sink ObamACare

Gee, are 5 million and 7 million really that different?

Got me thinking and drove me to the official CBO estimates to do some digging re: ObamaCare numbers.

 

image

 

Let’s highlight a couple of the numbers …

(more…)