Apparently, “horrification” depends on who is doing the assaulting.
Let’s loop back to the N.Y. Times coverage of the 3rd Presidential debate …
In a remarkable statement that seemed to cast doubt on American democracy, Donald J. Trump said that he might not accept the results of next month’s election if he felt it was rigged against him.
Hillary Clinton blasted that stand as “horrifying” at their final and caustic debate.
The horror became a cause celebre among Dems and the MSM.
Now, let’s fast forward …
The details according to the WaPo:
Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has been quietly exploring whether there was any “outside interference” in the election results and will participate in the election recount in Wisconsin initiated by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein.
And if Stein makes good on efforts to prompt similar processes in Pennsylvania and Michigan the Clinton campaign said it would do so there, as well.
The people have spoken and the election is over.
Hillary Clinton herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, ‘We must accept this result and then look to the future.’
P.S. We scoured both the Washington Post and N.Y. Times articles on Clinton’s apparent refusal to accept the certified election results.
Looking for the word “horrifying” and the phrase “American Democracy” in combination with the phrases “cast doubt on” or “attack on”, we got a “no results” message.