The following headline caught my eye:
More specifically, the WHO said:
“Ebola transmission … no longer constitutes an extraordinary event, the risk of international spread is now low, and countries currently have the capacity to respond rapidly to new emergences.”
Now, re-read the WHO statement, substituting the words “radical Islamic terrorism” for “Ebola transmission”.
Let’s connect a couple of more dots …
How was it that the world was able to get its arms around Ebola, but doesn’t seem to have a clue re: the spread of terrorism?
Maybe the answer is to start treating terrorism like a disease.
I don’t mean to clinically classify it so that it becomes rationalized and excusable.
Nope, I’m talking about treating terrorism as if it were a threatening disease.
Think about it.
How did Ebola get contained worldwide … and, kept from being a statistically significant threat in the U.S.?
First, the “world” declared war on the specific named enemy – Ebola – and put on a full-court press to stop its spread.
In the U.S., folks traveling from virus-plagued parts of the world (think, Africa) were stopped when attempting to enter the U.S., subjected to rigorous on-the-spot testing, quarantined if there was the slightest indication of infection, biometrically “registered” for tracking, and monitored to make sure that they weren’t spreading the virus.
Pretty good program with pretty good results right?
OK, now do some more word substitution.
Just change “virus-plagued parts of the world” to “terrorism-plagued parts of the world” and change “virus” and “infection” to “radicalization”:
“In the U.S., folks traveling from terrorism-plagued parts of the world (think, Syria) will be stopped when attempting to enter the U.S., subjected to rigorous on-the-spot testing (think, polygraphs maybe), quarantined if there was the slightest indication of radicalization, biometrically “registered” for tracking, and monitored to make sure that they weren’t spreading the radicalization.”
Sounds to me like a pretty good prescription.
So, next time you hear somebody shrug off the fact that refugee groups might contain a handful of radical Islamic terrorists, just ask them:
“What if the refugee groups contained a handful of Ebola-infected virus-spreaders?”
My bet is that they’ll give you a different answer.
So, why not treat terrorism like a disease?