Powerball economics … and, oh yeah, about regressive taxes.

Last night’s Powerball payoff was $1.6 billion.

Even at Powerball’s ridiculous odds – 1 chance in 250 million of winning – that’s a good bet statistically, right?

Let’s go thru some math.

In econ-speak, the nominal expected value of the payoff is $1.6 divided by 250 million … about $6.

Since each PB ticket costs $2 … and $6 is way greater than $2 … that’s a good bet, right?

 

image

=====

As Mr. Miyagi would tell the Karate Kid: “Not so fast, Grasshopper”

 

=======

First, the $1.6 billion is the sum of payments stretched over 30 years.

Remember the old ‘time value of money’?

The immediate cash payout is about $900 million … in MBA-talk: that’s the net present value.

OK, $900 million divided by 250 million (odds of winning) is almost $4 … and, $4 is double $2 … so, it’s still a good bet, right?

Again, not so fast.

Remember the the old tax the rich bromide?

Nail those 1 percenters with high taxes!

Well, welcome to the 1% club, Mr. Powerball winner.

Combined, Fed & state income taxes will be about 50%.

So, the $900 gets slashed to $450 … which, divided by 250 million, is less than the $2 cost of a PB ticket.

Oops … suddenly the good bet turns bad.

And, oh yeah, defying the odds, there were 3 winners.

So, divide the $450 by 3 and you get $150 million … which divided by 250 million odds … gives a win of 60 cents.

Subtracting the $2 ticket cost, and the net is a $1.40 loss per ticket.

Ouch.

A very bad bet, even with a headlined $1.6 billion payout.

=======

The real winners

Obviously, the big winners are the states and the Feds.

The states rake off the top – they don’t payout the full amount collected … and, they collect income taxes on the backend from the winners.

The Feds collect high-bracket income taxes from the winners

======

The losers

First, all the folks who bought tickets … save for the 3 who won … and those who got $2 worth of entertainment value from playing the game.

Empirical studies have shown that the vast majority of players are low and very low income folks dreaming of a score … the folks who can least afford to pour money down a rat hole.

In other words, PB is a truly regressive tax.

=====

Other losers: all of us tax payers.

To the extent that poor players are, in effect, using money that comes out of, say, subsidized food budgets … the real players and losers are all of the folks who pay taxes that fund the subsidies.

Think about that for a moment.

The entire “system” makes Bernie Madoff look pretty clean.

======

#HomaFiles

Follow on Twitter @KenHoma            >> Latest Posts

2 Responses to “Powerball economics … and, oh yeah, about regressive taxes.”

  1. John Carpenter Says:

    Florida and Tennessee do not have state tax and California exempts lottery winners from paying state tax. So they get off with “only” about 40% in federal taxes.

  2. John Carpenter Says:

    Oh…and the ticket vendor gets $1M for selling a winning ticket. So that’s a winner.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s